Cause, autonomy of the will and principle of individuation
The concept of cause of contracts has been improperly addressed since Domat, causing a state of unintelligibility and legal doctrines that deem the cause irrelevant, excluding it from legal thinking, or excessively important, justifying an excessive intervention of the market. This paper aims to inc...
保存先:
| 第一著者: | |
|---|---|
| フォーマット: | Online |
| 言語: | spa |
| 出版事項: |
Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
2023
|
| オンライン･アクセス: | https://revistapcc.uat.edu.mx/index.php/RPC/article/view/453 |
| タグ: |
タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
| 要約: | The concept of cause of contracts has been improperly addressed since Domat, causing a state of unintelligibility and legal doctrines that deem the cause irrelevant, excluding it from legal thinking, or excessively important, justifying an excessive intervention of the market. This paper aims to incorporate to this legal discussion some psychological elements to guide the understanding of this concept, its relation with the autonomy of the will and, as a consequence, the adequate kind of governmental intervention. Based on Joaquín Dualde’s ideas, I affirm that consent is the cause of contracts, and that the Law should look at the causes of such cause, that is to say, those elements and events which when manifested, configure the contract. I analyze the irrational elements of this configuration and, finally, based upon the Humanistic Psychology perspective and the individuation principle proposed by Carl Jung, I consider the possibility of effectively strengthening the effective freedom of people. |
|---|
